Author Archives: sergeantknuckles

Black Hopefuls Pick This Year in G.O.P. Races – NYTimes.com

Black Hopefuls Pick This Year in G.O.P. Races – NYTimes.com.

<!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Cambria Math”; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:”"; margin-top:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} p {mso-style-priority:99; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”,”serif”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
According to the article above Obama’s election has invigorated the hopes of persons of color to get elected to office.  Unfortunately, it for Dems it’s not all the left side of the spectrum.  Reluctantly, I have to agree with the article because generally this is a good thing.

As far as being a person of color, as I am one myself, I’m not sure that I understand the fierce loyalty to Democrats.  One could make the argument that Dems work on the behalf blacks, browns, and generally anybody who is not white, that they deserve unwavering support… but if one considers the continued sheer numbers of our people who are still crushingly uneducated, crushingly under-skilled, and thus crushingly poor then one has to wonder who they are really working and if the ceiling of what Democrats can do for us has been reached.  If you are voting because of what HAS been done in the past then you are going to be taken advantage of in the future.

Look, I’m a business major, I believe in competition, if you want your supplier to give you a better price, or have a chance of more equal negotiations, or if you want to break the entrenched status quo then there is no better way than to say, “You know I bet I can get a better deal elsewhere”.

Think about this, Unions are designed to protect their workers.  They band together for better wages (primarily) but also for better working conditions (their truest calling) and benefits; however, in doing so they raise the cost of doing business and make it more difficult for businesses to hire NEW workers.  Effectivly, while some general wins for union workers translate over to the whole of the workforce, unions generally only care about THEIR dues paying workers.  The result is this; a plethora of educated, trainable, hard working NEW employees is actually a threat to Unions.  Basic supply and demand says that any surplus of supply creates lower demand and lower demand creates lower prices.  Therefore a surplus of good workers drives down wages.  That sounds like a downside for workers but think about this; lower prices can create demand for goods.  Therefore, lower wages makes entrepreneurs more able and therefore more likely to create new businesses which create more jobs and creates more wealth for more workers.  With a single minded drive to create wealth for their own dues paying members Unions are actually unbalancing this delicate cycle on the macrolevel creating disincentives to for job creation.  The net result is an artificial scarcity of jobs and thus an increase in general employment opportunity.  As the old saying goes, “It must be nice work… if you can get it”

How does this apply to people of color getting elected as Republicans as this blog started out?  Well, as we are more likely to be without education, training and therefore employment then the opportunity sapping side effect of union activity works against us by hampering job creation, and since we as a bloc are so emotionally wedded to the Democratic party and since the Democratic party is so dependent on Union voting and money then just who is the proverbial red-headed step-child in this dynamic?  The answer is you my non-union new worker.

All that to make this point, if you want opportunity and better deal then make your party WANT you.  Be willing to threaten to defect and be willing to carry that out and for crying out loud, understand that just because your party is WORKING for you doesn’t mean that it’s HELPING you.  You DO have a choice and if you open your mind a bit you might find that people of color who step over the line and vote Republican are not traitors to our respective cultures but that we have thought and reasoned this out to some degree and to some level. My final question to you is this, is your tie to your party of choice emotional or reasoned?  If it’s emotional then maybe you need to firm up your beliefs, ask yourself what you’re core values are, what your deal breakers are and then vote that way consistently.  You might find that you’re voting against yourself more often than not.

I generally vote Republican even though I am more of a Conservative/Libertarian cross.  I’ll work for Republican candidates, but I don’t agree with everything they believe but at least those beliefs are more liberty and personal freedom oriented then Democrats.  You see, I vote Republican because of my beliefs in the purity of the Constitution and the simplicity of that one line, “…Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. No one owes me happiness; it is born out my own hands… or not at all.

Five Reasons Not to Despair – Rich Lowry – National Review Online

The legislation on which they’ve staked so much will not withstand its first contact with reality.

via Five Reasons Not to Despair – Rich Lowry – National Review Online.

House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it

The tactic — known as a “self-executing rule” or a “deem and pass” — has been commonly used, although never to pass legislation as momentous as the $875 billion health-care bill.

via House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it.

What!? Nothing, from no party should EVER be passed without being voted on.  I don’t care if it’s momentous or inconsequential.  Voting is the ONLY job those morons have, I wanna know what they stand for, it’s fundamental to judge whose worthy of my vote.

Chile earthquake: Military takes control as death toll passes 700 | Mail Online

“…two automatic teller machines were broken open, a bank was robbed and a supermarket emptied, its floor littered with mashed plums, scattered dog food and smashed liquor bottles.”

via Chile earthquake: Military takes control as death toll passes 700 | Mail Online.

I’m looking at the looting going on after the Chile 8.8 quake: and I’m wondering, could you live off the contents of your cupboard for 72 hours? W/o running water too?  W/o access to ATMs and/or with credit card machines down?

I admit, for most of the United States help is only the next county or state away, but I live in Los Angeles.  This is a desert and living here is only made possible because of the fantastic transportation network and access to running water brought in from outside the valley.  There are mountains that cut us off from the East and freeways that connect us to communites to the South and North.  If something close to a 7.o quake close to the surface ever happened nearer to L.A. proper then we’re f@cked.  The freeways are the only way to get anywhere quickly here and the population density is DENSE.  Grocery stores in any cut off regions would go dry in a matter of hours.  The crooks would be out knocking off banks and ATMs almost immediately.

The big killer here (after collapesed buildings) would be fires.  Most of the flora here is not native and would die off quickly once water is unavailble, it then becomes dry tender within a short time… but with blocked roads and rubble in the streets… and with many fires spread over the city then I can forsee the Fire Departments breaking down pretty quickly… especially if the water pressure is affected.

We could expect a major relief effort to commence almost immediatly via the national guard and other military units from nearby counties and states but again, if the transportation system is fatally compormised (weakend bridges, underpasses, tunnels, plus rubble and abandanded vehicles and refugees) then getting the troops and relief supplies has to done by airlift.  And that is just darned inefficient and sporadic.  We have plenty of regional airfields but they are spread out and I imagine roads leading away from them will be rubble strewn as well.

The big thing is going to be road blockage.  Supplies can brought in via ocean transport and via air, but if you can’t get it to the communites then the trouble starts.

It is thuse that I read the stories of looting and crime comming out of Chile with great interest.

Constitutional contempt

Constitutional contempt.

Supermajority fight club – Washington Times

Supermajority fight club – Washington Times.

Democrats are a party of contrasts. You have representatives of very conservative minorities like Hispanics in the same party as very liberal representatives like homosexuals. Were it not for both being minorities they would be at each others throats (see the recent gay marriage referendum voted down by Hispanics in California). You can make many comparisons very much like that throughout the Democratic constituencies… and thus, when they come to power these natural fault lines come to surface as each constituency attempts to overshadow their compatriots.

~SK

Hilton ‘evaluating’ Venezuelan hotel seizure

Isn’t this a scene from Atlas Shrugged?

RealClearPolitics – What’s Michael Moore Talking About?

Summary: Capitalism is not the same thing as a Free Market

Rage at Government for Doing Too Much and Not Enough – WSJ.com

“The greatest movement within the tea party is ‘None of the above,’” said Jim Bancroft, a founder of the tea-party group in Hartford, Conn. Officials in both political parties “need to be totally removed — every single one of them,” he said.

via Rage at Government for Doing Too Much and Not Enough – WSJ.com.

William McGurn: God vs. Science Isn’t the Issue – WSJ.com

William McGurn: God vs. Science Isn’t the Issue – WSJ.com.

~SK

The Obama-McChrystal Gap – HUMAN EVENTS

Preach it brother.

~SK

A Statistical Analysis of Maritime Unemployment Rates, 1946-1948. Just Kidding, More Liberal Lies About National Healthcare! – HUMAN EVENTS

A Statistical Analysis of Maritime Unemployment Rates, 1946-1948. Just Kidding, More Liberal Lies About National Healthcare! – HUMAN EVENTS.

I love a numbers argument that makes sense.

~SK

The Body Politics: On health-care reform, Democrats have become their own worst enemy. – Reason Magazine

The Body Politics: On health-care reform, Democrats have become their own worst enemy. – Reason Magazine.

I love these guys.

~SK

Washington Post Admits to Bogus Quote – HUMAN EVENTS

Washington Post Admits to Bogus Quote – HUMAN EVENTS.

“Veteran Washington Post reporter Daryl Fears, part of a two-person writer team, unmistakably wrote that filmmaker John O’Keefe had “said” he “targeted” ACORN, the advocacy group, for his candid-camera expose, because it registered voters to defeat Republicans.

O’Keefe said no such thing. It was a non-quote made out of whole cloth by reporter Fears, and published as fact on Sept. 17. Making the falsehood exponentially worse, the Post story then was retailed worldwide by the Associated Press.”

…all the news that’s not fit to print.

~SK

Al Qaeda Bombers Learn from Drug Smugglers – CBS Evening News – CBS News

“Taking a trick from the narcotics trade – which has long smuggled drugs in body cavities – Asieri had a pound of high explosives, plus a detonator inserted in his rectum.–CBS News”

That sounds like wonderful training program.  I mean, you don’t just show up with your mule, point him in the direction of the target and say “oh by the way, shove this up your anus.”  I imagine you have to get comfortable walking around with a pound of semtex shoved up there… not to mention the beeper and other wiring.  There has to be some sort of logistical training going on…

How do you recruit for this anyway?

‘Akmed, thank you for coming.  We are not allowed to view the private parts of women… or even the public parts to be sure… but I want you to show you my anus, and then I want to teach you to put things in it, large things… uncomfortable things.  And then I want to teach you to pack your own anus, with my help of course.  And I’m going to video tape this and show your packed anus to the world.  Yes Akmed, your anus will save all of Islam.  I will pack your anus Akmed.  Pack it tight.  Yes Akmed, we will pack the anus of a thousand young men Akmed… well not you, but you in spirit, technically it will be I who packs the anus’s.  And you will lead the way for other young wispy men.  Strong, sinewy, baby faced men will flock to me Akmed, all because of you.  You will show the way.  Allah be praised, I have waited for this day Akmed.  The day when I could pack the anus’s of men, um, with explosives of course, but to pack them deep, Akmed.  Deep.  I almost tear up with the possibilities, oh the glory, Akmed, the sheer glory of it all.  Now, bend over we will practice with this dildo.”

On the explosive side of things how do you get around the ‘tamping’ effect that goes along with the explosive being surrounded by what is in effect a 200 pound bag of water?  To channel the blast you would normally pack the explosive against the target and put water (or some other material) on the outside.  This focuses the blast.  …but, now these new ‘Ass Blowers’ would have essentially muffled the blast with their own innards.  Now the article says that the doofus who has pulled off this first blast packed one pound of HE in his is Allah hole and failed to kill his target.  This of course means that to over come this muffle effect they’ll have to pack in more then one pound… which brings up another question; just how many pounds could they concevibly shove up there?  …and should give pause to other would be Ass Blowers… just how much can they shove up there and how comfortable can you act while trying to sweat it out past security?  Really, would they have to practice?  I’m just saying to you potential ass blowers, think about it, you’re getting man raped by your best friends, more then once most likly.  Don’t they stone women because of that?

Well, in any case, do you know how to stop this?  You shame the shit out them (pun intended).  Maybe add pork products to all explosives.

~SK

RealClearPolitics – Lots of People Love Obama, But Does Anyone in the World Really Fear Him?

RealClearPolitics – Lots of People Love Obama, But Does Anyone in the World Really Fear Him?.

Love the “Happy Days’ referance.

~SK

A libertarian at Fox

A libertarian at Fox.

Welcome Mr. Stossel.

APNewsBreak: ACORN Sues Filmmakers – wjz.com

APNewsBreak: ACORN Sues Filmmakers – wjz.com.

Um.  Can you say, ‘discovery’?  This cannot go well for Acorn.

~SK

RealClearPolitics – Capitalism Is Not The Problem

RealClearPolitics – Capitalism Is Not The Problem.

Love it.  Just love it.

~SK

Times Higher Education – It’s the stupidity, stupid

Times Higher Education – It’s the stupidity, stupid.

The article is interesting but the real gems are the comments, LOL.

Barack Obama, College Administrator by Victor Davis Hanson on National Review Online

I don’t know if I completely agree but it’s a funny premise.

~SK

Carter: Racism plays major role in opposition to Obama – CNN.com

Carter: Racism plays major role in opposition to Obama – CNN.com.

Why yes Mr. Carter that is EXACTLY it!  It couldn’t be the 1000+ page boondoggle of bill or even the mere idea of government trying to care for 300 Million people.  I mean, that’s only 600 million first and last names to track… what could POSSIBLY go wrong?

Tonto.

~SK

Americans: Uncle Sam Wastes 50 Cents on the Dollar

Americans: Uncle Sam Wastes 50 Cents on the Dollar.

Americans: Uncle Sam Wastes 50 Cents on the Dollar
Figures are 42 cents for state governments; 37 cents for local
(the poll) http://www.gallup.com/poll /122951/Americans-Uncle-Sa m-Wastes-50-Cents-Dollar.aspx#1

Okay, look at the numbers on the second page of this poll. This is a horribly laid out poll and the analysis from this girl is SO way off. First she arbitrarily separates the divide at ‘below 50cents of waste and ‘above 50 cents of waste’ as if 50% waste is somehow acceptable. So, now going back to the actual poll results you see that the MIDDLE choice for those being polled is ’.26 cents to .50cents’. Do you realize that .26 cents wasted out of 1 dollar is 26% waste! That’s more than ¼! … 26% of 1 million is $260,000! This is somehow acceptable? I think not. If you were 1/4th wasteful at work you’d be fired. If your employer messed up your paycheck 1 out of 4 times (essentially once a month) would you still be working there?

So IF (and that’s a big if) we could say that 25% of government waste was acceptable then the analysis changes wildly. So, now let your friendly neighborhood analyst redo this….

Okay, for the 2009 poll you have 35%+19%+16 = 70%. That means 70% of people polled think that the government wastes .26 cents or more of EVERY DOLLAR! Or another way to think of this, you give the government a dollar and they spend .20 cents and the burn the other .80 cents

For 2001 the percentage is: 63%

1986: 51%
1984: 66%
1979: 60%

So from MY analysis of the numbers provided you can see a different story emerge and that story is this: on some fundamental level the American people KNOW that the government can not do ANYTHING without wasting large amounts of money. Now, I can tell you exactly why this works out, it’s called deadweight loss and it explains in economic terms how money is quite literally sucked out of the system when you tax it and give it to the government.

Now the original analysis differentiates from Federal, State and Local levels of waste but if you simply add in the middle answer (.25 to .50) then you see that there really is NO difference in what people think about the waste in their various governments.

Note, this is a Gallup Poll analyzed by Gallup themselves, from their analysis what does that tell you about just accepting someone else’s analysis? Right, you need to think for your damn self.

~SK

ACORN Fires More Officials for Helping ‘Pimp,’ ‘Prostitute’ in Washington Office

ACORN Fires More Officials for Helping ‘Pimp,’ ‘Prostitute’ in Washington Office – Local News | News Articles | National News | US News – FOXNews.com.

I don’t care what political persuasion their of, when you have two offices in two different states caught doing exactly the same thing then it is either a failure of leadership or instituted by leadership, either way, the organization is tainted… in its entirety because now the company culture is permeated by these types of shenanigans. It’s not like it’s H&R Block, these are highly interrelated offices motivated by a shared vision who eschew the corporate profit centered image… firing the employees is stopping well too short.

~SK

“That cost how much!”

tylenol You know, I’ve seen this a lot lately on many posts and blogs and comments, the $10, $12, and $20 dollar hospital Tylenol.  Typically this is used to justify some reform or another but I think we can put this into context very quickly…

Medi Cade and Medicare typically control costs by legislating services be priced below provider costs.  So, the hospital (aka ‘provider’) has to make it up somewhere… and so the costs get passed onto the insured and the uninsured.

Also, your typical trip to the drug store to buy a $7 dollar bottle of Tylenol doesn’t require a doctor (nurse practitioner?) to make sure it won’t interfere with other drugs or procedures.  You’re paying for the time of the provider and their entire infrastructure.  If you factored the capital outlay of your home, bed, sheets, and pillow (properly depreciated of course) into the cost of the drugstore Tylenol you might see that drugstore Tylenol cost start to rise, but you don’t factor that in because you’ve already paid for it.

I also imagine Hospitals have many special problems storing other medications that you don’t.  How many units of blood and plasma do you typically keep refrigerated in your home?  What about security and accountability for a whole host of narcotics experimental drugs?  It’s not like Wal-mart that can have the perfect ‘Just-in-time’ delivery system, getting product to the shelf just as the last one is being purchased by a customer thus saving on storage costs.  A hospital probably has to keep many drugs on hand never knowing when they will be needed incurring huge storage costs over time with an equally huge spoilage rate.  That has to be paid for my friends… and it’s not a cost that can go away even if the federal government takes things over.

But the underlying question is actually more basic: Just how DO you cut down the cost of medical care without government price mandates?  The simplistic answer is to over supply medical care.  The long term answer to that is more doctors… and the long term plan for that means beefing up medical schools but that takes working doctors out of the hospital and puts them in the classroom teaching… so the short term result is that you actually create a sharper shortage of doctors temporarily raising costs.  Darn, there is just no free lunch is there?

So now, that we have moved out of the emotional aspect of $20 Tylenol and transferred the argument to a more rational economic based argument can YOU think of ways to oversupply medical care?  That is the debate we need to be having.

~SK

Federalized Veterinarian Care… vision of the future

Okay. You want government run health care? I say, why not try it out on a test case? Let’s socialize PET healthcare. Sure why not? I mean, it’s the perfect test case no? Pets, while popular and beloved add nothing to the GDP themselves so it’s not like you’re screwing around with anything important, also it’s a relatively small market compared to human health care so if it does get screwed up then it’s no problem going back to its market based roots. But if it’s a success, oh boy! Think about it, the government could make a credible claim that it’s ready to run human healthcare! It’s also a healthcare market that is virtually untouched by complicated, state by state insurance rules and regulations. It’s virgin territory and just the perfect test bed to see what happens to a care system when you both remove health insurance AND institute complete government oversight.  Of course, we’ll have to define success in some pretty definitive ways… no fair letting the government create the scorecard (that’s a whole other post!).

So, let’s think about this… First of all, there seems to be a rather small pool of veterinarians… I mean, there are enough right now… but that’s because most people don’t take their animals in for healthcare because it’s so expensive (and optional)… but with free vet visits we can expect to see a doubling, tripling and probably even a quadrupling of demand for vet care. Of course, if you think about it, that takes one metric of success off the table… how’s that you ask? Well, if we measure success by how many NEW pets we enroll on Medi-Pet (my new name for the program) then we see that it’s a meaningless goal.  BUT Of COURSE it would be a success by this metric! Free vet visits… can you imagine the rush!  But if you think about it, what does quadrupling then number of new enrollies have to do with providing care?  Well, nothing really.  This of course begs the question, if it’s a meaningless goal then is it a meaningless argument too?

Anyway, now, to cope with that drastic increase in demand we’ll probably have to mandate that no veterinarian can turn away any pet. So this means that those rich folks who pay top dollar to veterinarian specialists to look after race horses, polo ponies, and ranchers with lots of livestock will have to just get in line with everyone else.  There are no favorites now, remember, it’s all free. But of course, with all the dogs, cats, hamsters, ferrets, snakes, llamas, horses, lizards, birds and fish out there requiring mandatory medical care we can probably still expect that there will be gaps in coverage. So, we’ll just have to prioritize now then won’t we?  Dogs and cats are pretty universal so they are covered; well call it Medi-Pet part 1. Pets like llamas and horses are pretty big animals but less prevalent so we’ll call them Medi-Pet part 2. Reptiles are somewhat popular so we’ll call them Medi-Pet part 3, birds can be part 4, and small mammals will be part 5.

Unfortunately coverage under Medi-Pet parts 3, 4, and 5 represent some very specialized and therefore expensive treatment, so unfortunately, due the shortage of vets, we’ll just have to delay treatment until there are enough vets to do the job. What’s that you say? Your rabbit won’t live that long? Well, I’m so sorry, but just think of the wonderful stew you’ll have! Oh, I’m really sorry, Stew was his name, too.

One of the issues of course is people with more than one pet. Forget about the cat hoarder who maintains a household of 20 or more felines, but instead let’s focus on dog breeder and see where that train of thought leads us… Now, normally, your dog breeder has SOME reluctance to overproduce dogs, there are of course DEMAND restrictions like how many people actually want a dog… many people who can’t afford to take proper care of a dog don’t get one. BUT NOT ANYMORE! We could expect that free pet care would increase demand for pets… moreover, pet producers would have an incentive to breed more pets… and it will all lead the deaths of many, many pets. You see, training veterinarians is a long process while breeding pets is not. Therefore, there will be an initial rush to buy pets, which will further backlog veterinarians offices and this means that many pets who need healthcare will not get it because it will quickly become too cumbersome to actually get an appointment… and thus many people who THOUGHT they had access to pet care now come to realize that FREE healthcare and ACCESS to healthcare are two separate issues.

So people who want one pet can have them, but so too will people who already have one or more pets. So our dog breeder who, say has one breeding female with 15 puppies a year, gets 16 dogs worth of coverage… and YOU pay for it. As a matter of fact, you are subsidizing the dog breeding business. The dog breeder can now afford to expand her operation and breed twice a year and now get another 15 puppies worth of care.  And the added cost to you dear taxpayer lives as long as those puppies live… the health care doesn’t end when the puppies are sold, they just get passed on to a new owner… and you keep getting the bill.

“But I have allergies!” You might say, “I can’t own a pet, much less two!”  You my friend have just bumped into ‘moral hazard’. The government has picked the winner, in this case anybody with a pet, and you my runny nosed friend, have lost. You gain NO benefit from the Medi-pet program and you will still pay to pick up the tab. The government has set a precedent for this sort of thing of course and there is no use bitching about it (pun intended)… you might already be a winner in one of them. Do you own a home? (tax benefit) Did you own a clunker and turn it in? (rebate) Have you purchased a hybrid car? (tax incentive) Did you recently buy a digital antenna converter? (Government voucher)

You see, your local politician will someday make you a ‘winner’, it’s inevitable, and you will take advantage of it, and when you protest someday when you are the loser (and that’s inevitable too) your local politician will say… “Why was it good for you then and not you now?”, and he will proceed to ignore you or call you a pet hater (pet racist? species racist!), evil, nazi, un-American, or just say that you’re too scared to change the current pet health care system because you don’t know enough about it (you ignoramous!).

Two of Knuckles' old dogs, RIP boys...

Two of Knuckles' old dogs, RIP boys...

…O I could go on and on… but I think you all are getting the picture…

~SK

:::Fire the Incumbents proudly introduces our newest contributor, Sergeant Knuckles:::

Hi there.

Hi there.

Thank you, thank you.  Of course you’re asking yourself, who’s this a-hole?  Well, read the about me section for starters, that’ll give you the context.

I’d like to thank Air Run for inviting me to his blog and I’m happy to have an outlet.  I’ve blogged before but mainly for the benefit of my many friends on Xanga, Myspace and Facebook but of course when people know who you are and see you daily then they are loath to disagree too much and therefore my ideas tended to bounce around a vacuum of indifference.  Being acquainted with Air Run and having bounced a few ideas off each other he felt I had something to contribute.  Now, I don’t think we see eye to eye on everything, but then, who does?  I think we both appreciate honest analysis and a measured give and take in the course of a discussion and so I hope that our mutual path to Vulcan logic is a fruitful partnership.

As to what you can expect from me… well, let’s just say that plenty of sarcasm and tongue in cheek analysis is my forte.  I enjoy reading a wide and deep range of topics and I enjoy commenting on those topics as well as putting my own ideas down on electronic ink.  Ah, the road ahead seems limitless.

Air Run seemed to like my analysis of state run healthcare and therefore my first real posting will be Pet Healthcare:  What would veterinary care look like if federalized? …coming soon.

~SK

P.S. Please note that I do notice the coincidence that I should start this venture on the anniversary of our collective wake up call.  Good or bad, it’s an omen.